Hlavní stránka/Archiv/2024, ročník 93 / číslo 4

Hlavní články

Rok 2024, ročník 93, číslo 4s. 385–404

Polabian diphthongization

Janczulewicz, PawełPočet zobrazení: 487recenzovaný článek
Rok 2024, ročník 93, číslo 4s. 405–429
Rok 2024, ročník 93, číslo 4s. 430–442
Rok 2024, ročník 93, číslo 4s. 443–455
Rok 2024, ročník 93, číslo 4s. 469–480

Recenze

Rok 2024, ročník 93, číslo 4s. 481–487
Rok 2024, ročník 93, číslo 4s. 488–496
Rok 2024, ročník 93, číslo 4s. 496–500

Nekrology

Rok 2024, ročník 93, číslo 4s. 504–510
Rok 2024, ročník 93, číslo 4s. 510–512

Obsah

Obsah

Počet zobrazení: 349
Rok 2024, ročník 93, číslo 4

Slovanské regionální idiomy střední Evropy a sčítání lidu

Rok 2024, ročník 93, číslo 4

Datum publikování: 2024
Autor: Knoll, Vladislav
Klíčová slova: regional languages, Census 2021, Silesian, Kashubian, Moravian, Rusyn
Abstrakt: In the text, the manifestation of regional linguistic identity in the results of the 2021 Census, which was carried out in most European countries, is examined. We focus on the Slavic idioms of Central Europe, in particular Silesian, Kashubian, Rusyn, Moravian and, to a lesser extent, Podlachian. The detailed output of the census allows us to compare the ethnic and linguistic self-identification of the respondents on a precise geographical scale and to confront it with a very basic linguistic and standardological background. Not all languages included in the statistics are recognised and standardised, and some respondents declared themselves to be speakers of a specific local dialect. In the case of non-standardised idioms, we briefly discuss the linguistic or extralinguistic definability of the idiom. In comparison with the results of previous censuses, the interest in regional linguistic identity seems to be decreasing, which is most visible in the case of Moravian. We discuss the case of Silesian in more detail, giving a brief overview of the attempts of Silesian activists to have Silesian recognised as the second regional language in Poland (after Kashubian). In respect of Rusyn, we comment on the problem of the variability of the idioms labelled as Rusyn in the local statistics. We are aware that data from different national censuses are not fully comparable, as the question on language may be defined in different ways (“spoken language”, “mother tongue”, “language spoken at home”). Despite these problems, census statistics are usually the only official data to refer to when quantifying the number of speakers of a language. These data can also be decisive, as they can pave the way for official recognition or administrative use of a language. However, in some countries, the native languages of the autochthonous population were not included in the census, which makes obtaining updated or complete data on the use of regional idioms impossible.
Rubrika: Hlavní články
Rozsah stran: s. 469–480
Status recenzování: recenzovaný článek
Licence: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

Citace (ISO 690)

error gettting citation: Something bad happened; please try again later.

Dostupné také z:
http://asjournals.lib.cas.cz/Slavia/article/uuid:bcf5f872-c1a6-4efe-b8d2-5b4f6adef260/detail